|
WHY TAPPING WORKS:
Speculations from the Observable Brain
Ronald A.
Ruden, M.D., Ph.D.
ABSTRACT
A new therapy
for phobias, PTSD, addictive behaviors and other psychological
issues was first described by Dr. Roger Callahan and involves
thought activation of the problem followed by tapping on certain
acupoints in a specific sequence. For most cases, the problems
were reportedly cured in a matter of minutes. We speculate on a
neuroanatomical and neurophysiological mechanism for this
technique.
We propose that
tapping and other sensory stimulation increase serotonin in both
the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala. The success of this
technique requires that glutamate be first increased in the
circuit by activating affect. We suggest the name 'Affect
Activation/Sensory Stimulation' to encompass this general
approach. AA/SS represents a paradigm shift for the treatment of
these problems.
INTRODUCTION
In 1986, Dr.
Roger Callahan discovered that tapping under the eye of an
individual with a water phobia immediately and permanently cured
this problem (Callahan, 2001). Tapping on specific traditional
Chinese medicine acupoints in a specific sequence literally
appears to throw a switch. After a successful treatment,
disturbing thoughts decrease and the phobic response disappears,
for good!
A large study
that involved over 29,000 patients was conducted using these
tapping procedures. The remarkable results (Andrade & Feinstein,
2003) covered a wide range of problems, such as specific
phobias, panic disorders, post-traumatic stress disorders, acute
stress disorders, and anxiety-depressive disorders. This method
was successful in 76% of the subjects.
A
neurobiological model must explain several characteristics of
this therapy:
* Why must the
distress be activated before it can be treated?
* Why is the
treatment specific to one phobia at a time?
* Why does the
same protocol work for many different problems?
* Why does the
distress appear to diminish during tapping (Wolpe 1958)?
* What is the
transduction event that converts tapping into a biological event
in the brain?
* How and why
does this treatment produce a rapid and permanent change in an
individual's response to the distressful thought?
THE AMYGDALA
AND EMOTION
Neuroimaging (Phan,
Wager, Taylor & Liberzon, 2004), lesional (Cousens & Otto,
1998), (LeDoux, Ciccheti, Xagoraris & Romanski,1990), (Blanchard
& Blanchard, 1972) and neuroanatomic (Sah, Farber, Lopez De
Armentia & Powers, 2003) studies point to the amygdala as the
final common pathway for expression of emotions. The amygdala is
well suited for this job, receiving input from the hippocampus,
the prefrontal cortex, the thalamus, midbrain nuclei, and other
cortical and subcortical areas (Maren, 2001). The amygdala is
made of several nuclei; the basolateral (BL), the lateral (LA)
and the basomedial (BM) make up the basolateral complex, the BLA
(Maren, 2001). The lateral nucleus receives the information from
other areas. The associations between a conditioned stimulus
and response are believed to be stored in the BLA, and when
appropriate, a signal is sent to the Central (Ce) nucleus of the
amygdala. Activation of the Ce is necessary to produce the
behavioral, autonomic and endocrine components of an emotional
response by activating other areas of the brain, including
projecting neurons to the nucleus accumbens, locus coeruleus,
paraventricular nucleus, the hypothalamus, and the prefrontal
cortex.
ENCODING FEAR
Of all the
emotional states we experience, fear is the most primitive and
powerful. If we understand how a fear response is disrupted, we
may be able to understand how tapping works. Phobias are
characterized by a persistent, irrational and excessive fear of
objects or situations like bugs, colors, numbers, light, dark,
bridges, tunnels, elevators and planes. Since no imminent
danger is associated with these objects or situations, they can
be considered conditioning stimuli (CS). A special genetic and
environmentally modulated neurobiological landscape is necessary
to encode a phobia (Gapenstand, Annas, Ekbolm, Oreland &
Fredrikson, 2001). Treatment that disrupts the encoded phobic
response may therefore extinguish it forever.
Phobias are
learned and as such are fundamentally different than responses
to innate fears. A fear response is generated by sensing an
innate fear, also called Unconditioned Fear Stimuli (UFS). Such
stimuli reflect the fear of being killed and are hard wired in
the brain, including fear of the unknown (novel situations),
heights (falling), closed spaces (being trapped), open spaces
(no place to hide), creepy crawly things (land based predators)
and something coming out of our visual fields (air based
predators). These survival stimuli do not reach consciousness
because details are unimportant: only the emotion of fear is
experienced, mandating avoidance. Accordingly, the thalamus,
which is the first sensory connection in the brain, has direct
projections to the amygdala (Doron & LeDoux, 1999).
A phobia is
generated by an innate (unconditioned) fear stimulus leading to
a fear response in the presence of another object or situation.
For example, traveling over a bridge (CS), you look down and see
the height (UFS). The height causes fear, leading to a phobia of
bridges.
NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Animal studies
of conditioned fear suggest that glutamate agonists enhance
learning and glutamate antagonists inhibit the learning of the
fear response in mice (Myers & Davis, 2002). Glutamate, an
excitatory amino acid, is involved in activating genes that are
necessary for memory storage and retrieval (Reidel, Platt &
Micheau, 2003). These genes alter the wiring and firing of
neurons. This implies that glutamate is released locally where
learning takes place. GABA, an inhibitory amino acid, inhibits
glutamate and, as such, GABA agonists inhibit fear conditioning
and GABA antagonists accelerate it (Myers & Davis, 2002).
EXTINCTION
TRAINING
Chemical
approaches have extinguished fear conditioning in animals using
infusions of anisomycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor (Nader,
Schafe & LeDoux, 2000) and the GABA agonist muscimol (Muller,
Corodimas, Feidel & Ledoux, 1997). The conclusions were that a
fear response could only be disrupted shortly after being
activated, that protein synthesis was involved, and that a GABA
agonist could temporarily disrupt the fear response. In another
experiment, depletion of serotonergic neurons prevented
extinction of the fear. These results imply that serotonin plays
a role in extinction (Fiberger, Lepiane & Phillips, 1978).
Research has
documented a group of inhibitory neurons intercalated between
the BLA and the central nucleus (Ce) of the amygdala as the
potential mechanism for this fear extinction. (Pare, Royer,
Smith & Lang, 2003).
WHY TAPPING
WORKS
We believe that
"affect activation" is the critical aspect for success of the
tapping method and propose that during affect activation,
glutamate is locally released in areas corresponding to the
neural circuit that initially encoded the conditioned fear.
Without local release of glutamate, no amount of tapping will be
effective. Tapping or other sensory stimulation (massage, eye
movement, etc.) then causes a global, non-specific release of
serotonin via ascending pathways.
During sensory
stimulation, we speculate that serotonin decreases the
inhibitory signal from the prefrontal cortex to the intercalated
neurons and allows for GABA release, thus inhibiting the outflow
from the central nucleus (Ce) of the amygdala, and the patient
experiences a decrease in distress.
Simultaneously,
serotonin causes GABA release via serotonergic receptors in the
BLA. We speculate that this combination, GABA and serotonin,
inhibits glutamate from activating protein synthesis, preventing
the re-storing of the fear response and thus de-linking the CS
to UFS pathway.
To better
understand de-linking, imagine the brain like a beach filled
with holes (CSs). As a specific thought activates a fear
response, a certain hole in the BLA fills with glutamate, then
links with a UFS and sends a signal to the Ce. During tapping,
when a serotonin wave flows in, GABA is released, and the
glutamate filled hole and only the glutamate filled hole
solidifies, inhibiting protein synthesis and disrupting the link
to the UFS. Since the hole is now gone, the ability to
re-activate the CS to UFS link by glutamate release is lost.
Distress is decreased by directly blocking the Ce outflow. How
tapping raises serotonin and GABA remains uncertain, but a
simple mechanical process involving sensory receptors has been
proposed (Andrade and Feinstein 2003).
CONCLUSIONS
AND OTHER THOUGHTS
This model
suggests that activation of affect followed by sensory
stimulation provides a neurobiological basis for tapping
therapy. This model outlines an explanation for permanence,
specificity, and ability to generalize to other types of
affective problems via amygdala de-linking.
Among the major
controversies present in the field of Energy Psychology, of
which TFT is representative, is the location and sequence of
tapping. While the neurobiological model does not require a
specific sequence of tapping, sensory receptor density (location
where you tap) may affect the rate and intensity of serotonin
release. Any stimulation that affects the serotonin system can
be used. Thus, tapping, humming, mind-full meditation, cognitive
tasks, and eye movements may be useful. The goal for this
therapy then becomes how best to activate the affect and find
the appropriate sensory stimulation for the individual. Herein
lies the skill of the therapist.
References
Andrade, J. &
Feinstein, D. (2003). Preliminary report of the first large
scale study of energy psychology. www.emofree.com/research/andradepaper.htm.
Blanchard, D.C.
& Blanchard, R.J. (1972). Innate and conditioned reactions to
threat in rats with amygdaloid lesions. J. Comp. Physiol. Rev.
81:281-90.
Callahan, R.
(2001). Tapping the Healer Within. Contemporary Books, Chicago
Ill.
Cousens, G. &
Otto, T. (1998). Both pre- and post-training excitotoxic lesions
of the BLA abolish the expression of olfactory and contextual
fear conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 10:1062-1069.
Doron, N.N. &
LeDoux, J.E. (1999). Organization of projections to the lateral
amygdala from auditory and visual areas of the thalamus in the
rat. J Comp Neuro. 412(3):383-409.
Fibiger, H.C.;
Lepiane, F.G. & Phillips, A.G. (1978). Disruption of memory
produced by stimulation of the dorsal raphe nucleus. Mediation
by serotonin. Brain Res. 155:380-386.
Gapenstrand,
H.; Annas, P.; Ekbolm, J.; Oreland, L. & Fredrikson, M. (2001).
Human fear conditioning is related to dopaminergic and
serotonergic biological markers. Behav. Neurosci. 115:358-64.
LeDoux, J.E.;
Cicchetti, P.; Xagoraris, A. & Romanski, L.M. (1990). The
lateral amygdaloid nucleus: sensory interface of the amygdala in
fear conditioning. J. Neurosci. 10:1062-69.
Maren, S.
(2001). Neurobiology of Pavlovian fear conditioning. Ann. Rev.
Neurosci. 24:897-931.
Muller, J.;
Corodimas, K.P.; Feidel, Z. & LeDoux, J.E. (1997). Functional
inactivation of the lateral and basal nuclei of the amygdala by
muscimol infusion prevents fear conditioning to an explicit
conditioned stimulus and contextual stimulus. Behav. Neurosci.
111:683-691.
Myers, K.M. &
Davis, M. (2002). Behavioral and neural analysis of extinction.
Neuron 36:567-584.
Nader, K.;,
Schae, G.E. & LeDoux, J.E. (2004). Fear memories require protein
synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval.
Nature 406:722-726.
Pare, D.;
Royer, S.; Smith, Y & Lang, E.J. (2003). Contextual inhibitory
gating of impulse traffic in the intra-amygdaloid network. Ann.
N.Y. Acad. Sci. 985:78-91.
Phan, K.L.;
Wager, T.D.; Taylor, S.F. & Liberzon, I. (2004). Functional
neuroimaging of human emotions. CNS Spectrum 9(4)258-66.
Reidel, G.;
Platt, B. & Micheau, J. (2003). Glutamate receptor function in
learning and memory. Behav. Brain Res. 140:1-47.
Wolpe, J.
(1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford
University Press, Stanford, CA.
Find
more related links here:
Why Energy Psychology Works from A Western Scientific
Perspective
Interesting
Articles on Psychology and Psychotherapy
New
Leading Edge Therapies Information
& Articles
|
375
Municipal Drive, Suite 230, Richardson, TX 75080

Steve Reed is available for
an office appointment for your counseling and
psychotherapy needs in the Dallas, Fort Worth, DFW
metroplex, including Addison, Allen, Arlington, Bedford,
Carrollton, Colleyville, Denton, Euless, Flower Mound,
Frisco, Garland, Grand Prairie, Grapevine, Highland Park,
Hurst, Irving, Keller, Lake Highlands, Lewisville,
McKinney, Mesquite, Plano, Richardson, Rockwall, Rowlett,
and University Park. He also offers phone appointments from
anywhere in the world. Steve is a
creator of self
help products,
seminars
for the public, and
professional training classes on new
leading-edge therapies
such as REMAP,
EFT
Emotional Freedom Technique,
EMDR Eye
Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, TFT Thought Field Therapy,
and NLP Neuro Linguistic
Programming.
Copyright
© 1997-2007 Steve Reed,
Dallas Counseling & Psychotherapy.
All rights reserved. |
|